Last updated: Tue Sep 07 12:15:12 +0000 2010

Gettysburg casino: A loser for the landscape of the Chesapeake Watershed

Historical and ecological conservation overlap in the work of many land conservancies and allied efforts. Sometimes an issue comes up that challenges the values behind that vital connection in a pa...
Songs of Life

One summer, I rode my bike down a country road, which was lined by assorted levels of development. For five minutes I was zooming by green carpets of lawn, artful landscaping and blacktop driveways...
the pushmi-pullyu of pennsylvania land policy

So on Sunday we were in Beaverland in Snyder County, first at an Orthodox house-church service in Beavertown where our oldest Nick afterward gave a rendition of the story of Joseph during coffee ho...
Emotions—Your Connection to the Land

Landowners interested in conserving their properties do so for various reasons.  Some are logical—the land is adjacent to a state park, state forest, game lands, or other existing open space, so wh...
Kids, McKibben and Climate Change

This group of cheerful children had something to say about land protection as they performed to the Woody Guthrie tune, “This Land is Your Land” by singing, “This land is our land. It’s not a gasla...

Quote of the Day

“Let us give Nature a chance; she knows her business better than we do.”
— Michel De Montaigne (1533-1592)
Sub_cap

The Bad News: $1.3 Billion Diverted, Cut From Environmental Programs Over Last 8 Years

Source: PA Environment Digest (7/5/2010)

The budget just adopted for FY 2010-11 means a total of $1.3 billion has been diverted or cut from environmental programs to help balance the state budget or to fund programs that could not get funding on their own over the last eight years. Here's the rundown:
  • $428 million in Act 339 grants intended to support wastewater plant operations over the last eight years were eliminated to balance the budget;
  • $143 million diverted from the DCNR Oil and Gas Fund to balance the FY 2008-09 budget;
  • $79 million cut from the DEP and DCNR General Fund budget during FY2009-10;
  • $60 million diverted from the DCNR Oil and Gas Fund to balance the FY 2009-10 budget;
  • $100 million in 2002 from the Underground Storage Tank cleanup insurance fund to balance the budget (although this is slowly being repaid over 10 years);
  • $52.7 million “one-time” diversion from the Keystone Recreation, Parks and Conservation Fund in 2006 to balance the budget;
  • $50 million in 2007 and 2008 from the Environmental Stewardship Fund, which supports mine reclamation and watershed restoration, to fund the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Program because there was no agreement on how to fund that program;
  • $85 million in FY 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 from the Environmental Stewardship Fund to pay debt service on the Growing Greener II bond issue and taking funding away from restoration projects each year for the next 25 years – reflecting a pattern of only environmental programs being required to address their own bond debt service;
  • $15 million from the Recycling Fund in to balance the FY 2008-09 budget;
  • $18.4 million put into budgetary reserve in 2008-09 from the Department of Environmental Protection and Department of Conservation and Natural Resources;
  • $5 million reduction in Resource Enhancement and Protection (REAP) farm conservation tax credit program in FY 2009-10;
  • $102.8 million cut from the DEP and DCNR General Fund budget in proposed FY 2010-11 budget;
  • $180 million diverted from the DCNR Oil and Gas Fund to General Fund in proposed FY 2010-11 budget;
  • $5.5 million reduction in Resource Enhancement and Protection (REAP) farm conservation tax credits in FY 2010-11; and
  • $5 million in additional cuts to the agencies to balance the FY 2010-11 budget.
 
Many of these cuts significantly reduced the capacity of DEP and DCNR to do their jobs.
 
The FY 2009-10 budget cuts required DEP and DCNR to furlough or eliminate 333 full time positions and DCNR had to eliminate or reduce hours for 1,131 seasonal workers.
 
In addition, before DEP starting hiring Marcellus Shale natural gas regulatory staff, the agency lost 19 percent of its staff and positions, about 600 positions.
 
In contrast to private industry facing cuts in revenue, state agencies do not have their obligations reduced, no environmental laws and programs have been repealed and  DEP and DCNR are expected to do all the same things they did before.
 
Further budget cuts at DEP means further delays in processing permits that will hold up hundreds of millions of dollars in business and municipal projects.
            

Growing Greener Bankrupt

In 2005 voters did approve a $625 million Growing Greener II bond issue, but that bond and the implementing legislation in 2006 capped the original Growing Greener program  and expanded its original purpose.  The bond issue funds ran out this year.
 
The original purpose was to fund watershed restoration, mine reclamation, capping abandoned oil and gas wells, drinking water and wastewater system improvements farmland preservation and parks and recreation projects.
 
But in 2005-06, the projects Growing Greener II could fund expanded to include funding alternative energy projects, downtown redevelopment projects, the Game and Fish and Boat Commissions, provided funding for similar projects by counties and diverted the $4.25 per ton fee on waste disposal to paying off the debt service for the bond.
 
For the first time in FY 2010-11, more than half of the income in the Environmental Stewardship Fund (Growing Greener) will go for debt service-- $36.8 million-- with only $33.2 remaining for projects.  In addition, the proceeds from the Growing Greener II bond will be exhausted this year to support projects.
 
Debt service payments will increase to $60 million of the $66 million in new revenues coming into the Fund annually leaving little funding for mine reclamation, watershed restoration, oil and gas well plugging, agricultural best management practices, recreation and farmland preservation.
 
And with Growing Greener II bond monies now gone, project funding will drop from $54 million a year to just $15 million.
 

Other Environmental Funding

Just to complete the environmental funding picture, in 2008 the General Assembly approved a $650 million bond issue to fund renewable energy projects, a $800 million H2O Water Infrastructure Program funded by gaming revenue to fund drinking water, wastewater, flood protection and high hazard dam repair projects outside of Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and a $400 million water infrastructure bond issue was passed by voters.

Comments

Oldest first | Newest first

Please log in to post a comment.



About Us

Vision, mission goals and more

Archive

Articles & newsletters

Listserv

Get updates & respond

RSS Rss

Subscribe to
our feed


Conservation Easement Assistance Program Technical Assistance Program Terms of Use

The people of the Pennsylvania Land Trust Association envision a prosperous Pennsylvania, where communities know that their treasured green places will endure. We envision a Commonwealth where the lands that guarantee our water quality are safeguarded; where every child can safely play at a nearby park; where our productive farmland and forests are protected, securing our food and timber supply; and where wild places are preserved for wildlife and people.

Thank you to the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources for supporting the Association’s conservation efforts.

© 2010 Pennsylvania Land Trust Association